Keep and Share logo     Log In  |  Mobile View  |  Help  
 
Visiting
 
Select a Color
   
 
Antibiotic Treatment of Animals Infected with Bb Wormser 2009

 

Preview this DOCX File:

 


Creation date: Oct 30, 2011 11:19am     Last modified date: Oct 30, 2011 11:58am   Last visit date: Apr 24, 2024 12:38am
1 / 20 comments
Nov 7, 2014  ( 1 comment )  
11/7/2014
2:19am
Christine Heidt (christine_heidt)

Dr Wormser freely admits here that although culture remains negative, PCR results show the presence of spirochetes after the typical 3-6 wk antibiotic regime. He goes on to say that their presence is not associated with disease. This statement is troubling in that it does not appear to be based on sound scientific practices but rather appears to be based on his personal opinion as he does not reference any medical studies to justify his conclusions.

 

Furthermore Wormser also notes that different antibiotic regimes may be necessary to treat Lyme disease even though he presently asserts that all combinations of antibiotics will not cure chronic Lyme disease because it doesn’t exist…even though he has shown here that PCR results are positive in chronic sufferers. He prefers to term this animal as “post Lyme disease”. It doesn’t make sense to the logical person and yet the CDC and the IDSA are eating it up like candy.

 

Wormser concludes that there is no scientific evidence to support the hypothesis that these lingering spirochetes are responsible for chronic illness. Perhaps Wormser himself has no scientific studies to indicate chronic illness, however many other credible scientists have published data to the contrary.

 

It is a sad day when the power of the IDSA becomes stronger than the power of logic!!

 

Editorial by C. Heidt

BSc in Chemical & Material Engineering

    Report Objectionable Content